Evaluation of the treatment utility of a jobseeker segmentation and intervention program
Evaluation of the treatment utility of a jobseeker segmentation and intervention program
To what extent does a psychosocial intervention (PSI) improve employment rates for welfare-receiving jobseekers who differ in ethnicity, length of unemployment, physical location, gender, and readiness for change? Two large-scale studies (Study 1: 2,459 jobseekers, Study 2: 20,057 jobseekers) across a diverse Australian sample sought to assess factors that moderated the efficacy on return-to-work outcomes of a PSI program (comprising 31 evidence-based exercises that are purported to build psychological states such as self-efficacy, resilience, and well-being) when compared to a government-funded treatment as usual (TAU) re-employment service.